top of page
WLW Group
  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Email

Proposed Trust Tax Changes

Why Trusts Are Back in the Spotlight

Proposed Trust Tax Changes
Proposed Trust Tax Changes

The Federal Government’s proposed trust tax changes have placed discretionary trusts back under heavy scrutiny.

For many business owners, farming families, professionals and investors, the concern is not simply higher tax, but whether long-standing structures will still remain commercially effective.


Many clients are now asking:

  • Will family trusts still work?

  • Should we restructure now?

  • Will distributions become restricted?

  • Are bucket companies still effective?


At this stage, no final legislation has been released, and the details remain incomplete.


Importantly, the final rules may differ significantly from the initial Budget announcement.


However, the proposal is significant enough that families and business owners should begin to understand its potential implications now.

Why Families Use Trusts In The First Place

Family trusts have never been purely about tax.


For many business owners and investors, trusts are primarily used for:

  • Asset protection

  • Succession planning

  • Investment ownership

  • Business risk management

  • Intergenerational control

  • Long-term family flexibility


This is particularly common among:

  • Farming families

  • Medical professionals

  • Builders and tradies

  • Family investment groups

  • Privately owned businesses


Tax flexibility is often only one part of a much broader commercial structure.

What Is Proposed To Change?

Based on the current Budget announcement, from 1 July 2028:

  • A 30% minimum tax may apply to discretionary trusts

  • The trustee would generally pay the tax

  • Beneficiaries may receive non-refundable tax credits

  • Limited rollover relief may be available for certain restructures

  • Some exclusions are expected to apply


Current Budget material suggests the minimum tax may not apply to:

  • Primary production income

  • Certain testamentary trusts

  • Fixed trusts


However, the exact scope of those exclusions remains critically important and has not yet been finalised.


The detail will ultimately determine how significant these changes become for different families and business structures.


Practical Example - Farming Family

A cattle farming family operates through a discretionary trust structure.


The trust currently provides:

  • succession flexibility between children

  • protection of family assets

  • management of seasonal income fluctuations

  • flexibility around annual profit distributions


Under the proposed minimum tax framework:

  • Annual tax outcomes may change significantly

  • Distribution flexibility could become less effective

  • Bucket company strategies and retained profit planning may require closer management


However, the trust structure itself may still remain commercially appropriate because of:

  • land ownership protection

  • succession planning

  • intergenerational control

  • creditor protection


This is why trust reviews should never focus purely on annual tax savings.


Practical Example - Medical Practice

A specialist medical practice operates through a company structure, while surplus profits and investments sit within a family trust.


Historically:

  • Trust distributions may have improved overall family tax outcomes

  • Investments may have been separated from business trading risk

  • Retained profits may have been managed through bucket company arrangements

Under the proposed rules:

  • Distribution strategies may need substantial review

  • Future investment structures may change

  • Retained profit strategies may require tighter management


However, removing the trust structure entirely could also create:

  • Asset protection issues

  • Succession complications

  • Ownership rigidity

  • Increased exposure to trading risk


Again, the broader commercial purpose of the structure remains critically important.

What Clients Should Not Do

Clients should not:

  • Panic restructure

  • Assume trusts are suddenly obsolete

  • Trigger unnecessary CGT or stamp duty

  • Ignore legal and asset protection consequences

  • Assume every trust structure will be treated the same way


There is a major difference between the following and the detail matters enormously:

  • Discretionary trusts

  • Fixed trusts

  • Testamentary trusts

  • Primary production structures

What Clients Should Review Now

Most business owners and investors should begin reviewing:

  • Trust deeds

  • Beneficiary structures

  • Historical distribution patterns

  • Bucket company arrangements

  • Succession planning objectives

  • Long-term ownership structures


For some families, future restructuring may eventually make commercial sense.


For others, the existing structure may remain entirely appropriate despite different tax outcomes.

Final Thoughts

The proposed trust tax changes are significant, but they do not remove the broader commercial reasons trusts exist in the first place.


For many families and privately owned businesses, trusts will likely continue to play an important role in:

  • Asset protection

  • Succession planning

  • Family control

  • Investment ownership

  • Long-term commercial flexibility


The focus now should be on strategic review and forward planning, not rushed restructuring decisions driven by headlines.


If you want to chat about your situation or have any questions, we are here to help.


Nijo Antony

Director

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page